Poor Mr Plaskitt MP needs a massive grant to communicate with his constituents – we wonder why? See the article here in the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/7386502/MPs-demand-right-to-travel-first-class.html
He states:
"I [already] end up subsidising the operation from my own resources. Curb what is allowed in this area and you curb the service we give to our constituents."
At least half of his budget must be in dealing with one constituent in particular, we suspect.
The rest of the article gives over to other little piggy’s needing to travel first class on trains so that they can work – not that Plaskitt does much when he is actually in the House, certainly not of late if you check his Hansard record.
We think MPs should travel first class as it keeps them out of second class where you find a better sort of person – however they should pay the extra cost out of their own pockets.
Wilt
Dear Wilt
ReplyDeletePlaskett should seek sponsorship from Mrs C. After all,93 percent of his time is spent in dealing with her. He could them be rightly referred to as the Honourable Member for Mrs C. Perhaps not, she probably has complained about him now after he admitted to the entire world that she was of unsettled mind. In other words,nuts. It probably did not do their relationship any good by his further admission that after all his years of trying on her behalf, no one wanted to hear and no one wanted to listen. And, all those nasty files are still out there and there is nothing that he can do about it. A truely second class service from a third class little boy James
Tracey from Coventry.
Dear Wilt
ReplyDeleteI am a small time farmer. I have just received a cheque from Defra. The cheque is for £3000. The cheque is for,to quote;
"not rearing pig"
I think this is a wonderful idea from a Government Agency. Obviously, I intend not to rear a lot more pigs in the future. I will then be rolling in money.
Could Ofsted, another government agency, make the same offer to Social Services Departments. Could they ask social services not to rear any more Mrs C's. If social services promised not to rear a lot more Mrs C's, they would also be rolling in money.
Just imagine, a world without pigs or Mrs C's and all via a Government Agency idea. Thank you Defra.
James Basket Case
Dear Wilt
ReplyDeleteMrs C has no'right'to be a foster carer. She gave up that right when she abused the rights of vulnerable children to have details of their lives kept confidential. We must never cease to remind her and the whole world of the abuse she carried out.
Altar Boy
Dear Wilt
ReplyDeleteWhere is pea brain Plaskett? I think I know. He is running around naked in the reeds and sand dunes of Studland Bay. He is in hiding from Mrs C. He like NCSC and CSCI, lead her up the road of ruin. He like her,NCSC and CSCI is now ruined and 'no one wants to hear and no one wants to listen'.
Where is her fostering agency, XXXX. They know Mrs C is at least unstable and has a personality disorder. Yet they allow vulnerable children to be placed with her. This is corporate negligence.
Even pea brain plaskett has said Mrc C is of unsettled mind.
XXXX have a duty of care toward the children they place with Mrs C. They likewise have a duty to ensure that Mrs C is mentally fit to foster.
Given the recorded history of Mrs C and the widespread view that she is 'nuts', the least XXXX should do is commission a psychiatric report on her. This would be one step toward their obligation to safeguard the unfortunate children the continue to place with Mrs C.
Steth Oscope